Greater Hartford Youth Engagement Team
Initiative Meeting
Meeting
Notes
76
Pliny Street, Hartford, 5/15/17
1.
Introductions
2.
CCEH Youth Dashboard Mimi presented the Youth
Dashboard that has some data on youth who go through 211/CAN system. All data is available on the entry dashboard
on CCEH’s website. Mimi says the data on
the dashboard on CCEH’s website will be distributed to everyone.
3.
Housing Resources for Youth and Young Adults
i. Katie Durand
explained that we are working to complete the CAN YETI Discussion on Needs of
Region to End Youth Homelessness Form by July 12th all across the
state, to help guide prioritization of service development with the HUD grant.
ii.
See form provided by CCEH.
iii.
Mimi asks what is the number of Outreach providers in Greater Hartford CAN are
just for youth referrals?
a. Matt says Compass Youth Collaborative has an outreach
program
b. Mollie says The Connection has an outreach program.
iv.
Matt says the Greater Hartford CAN has 5 other agencies that have outreach agencies.
v. Mimi asks how
do people think the outreach process is going in Greater Hartford CAN?
a.
Theresa says the coordination piece is a gap in the outreach process.
vi. Matt says
getting schools and social service departments in towns needs to improve.
a. Mollie says it
has been challenging getting town social service departments to be part of the Greater
Hartford CAN.
vii. Theresa says
the challenge with outreach is what to do with clients when identifying them,
because we still don’t have a lot of consistency among different providers.
4.
Needs Assessment for Outreach
i. Matt says we
need a Greater Hartford CAN referral process for when identifying youth who are
seeking services.
ii. Seweryn
suggests a drop in center for youth
iii. Theresa
suggests having outreach workers focus on working with youth.
iv. The group
identified that we don’t currently have a youth navigator, and this is a need
in our community.
5.
Needs Assessment (Triage)
i. Mimi asks what
does DCF do when a youth under 18 appears for emergency housing?
a. Doug says DCF
uses the Lexux Nexus System and only can use for someone who has an open DCF
case and they use mediation steps.
b. Doug says
anytime someone identifies a youth that is seeking emergency housing that is
under 18 they should call the DCF Caroline.
ii. Mimi asks what
is the triage process for when a youth is under 18 and is refusing DCF?
a. Rose says The
Bridge could only work with the client if they can sign the youth in.
b. Rose says the
Basic Center is a possible resource, but she is not part of that department.
c. Doug says there
are SVIT beds available for youth when getting discharged but usually if for
youth who are involved with DCF and give the youth and foster family a break
and that is where DCF will do mediation for 14 days with youth.
iii. Doug says
during triage process to ask youth client if they have an open case in DCF.
iv. Doug says DCF
can work with a client as long as they are under 18, no felonies which regions
can use at own discretion,
v. Dough says he will
send out the qualifications for youth to work with DCF
vi. A major gap that was identified was a need
for emergency housing (shelter) specifically for youth, both under 18, and
between 18-24.
6.
Process
i. Theresa says
more information about agencies that provide services for youth, especially
those that work with homeless youth in the Greater Hartford CAN.
ii. Mimi suggests
to do an asset mapping for Greater Hartford CAN for youth programs/services
a.
Katies says it appears that asset mapping has
already started by completing the youth residential and employment inventory
charts which include eligibility and referral process, but that after these are
finished, the information should be shared more widely with the CAN.
7.
Needs Assessment (Housing)
i. Theresa says more
permanent supportive housing would be helpful, but the conversation ends
stating that rapid rehousing may be a better approach our non-time limited
housing.
ii. Seweryn says
vocational training would be important when providing housing for youth.
8. Determining Regional Priorities
9. Wrap Up and Next Steps
10.
The group put stickers up on the wall to highlight some of the
priorities the group felt were most important.
11. The topics that got the most
stickers were as follows:
i. Drop In Center
for Youth – (there were mixed ideas about the scope of this type of program,
but there was agreement that at the minimum it should be a place that youth
could go during the day to get information, services and referrals. Some
thought it could also include providing ongoing services and housing
assistance).
ii. Emergency
Housing for ages 18-24 – short term apartments or rooms or shelter specifically
for this population.
iii. Youth Rapid
Rehousing (housing programming that would encourage independence, employment,
short – term housing would be the norm, but ideally longer term housing would
be available for those who need it.)
iv. Coordination
(Improve communication and coordination between youth and adult homeless
outreach providers, youth and adult housing and shelter providers, local school
systems, DCF, DMHAS YAS, Juvenile Justice, youth employment providers, and
other service providers, etc.)
v. Youth
Navigation (assistance helping youth to navigate the shelter and housing
systems, obtain necessary documentation, and ensure that homeless youth can
access the services they need).
Voting:
· Emergency Shelter
o
Under 18: 0 Votes
o
(18-24): 14 Votes
· Outreach Coordination / Youth Navigator:
10 Votes
· Youth Rapid Re-Housing: 7 Votes
· Respite Housing/Drop-In Center: 7 Votes
· Outreach Expansion: 1 Vote
· Youth Diversion Funding: 1 Vote
· Non-Time Limited Housing: 1 Vote
No comments:
Post a Comment