GH CAN Leadership / GH CAN Sub-COC 3/6/19

Greater Hartford Coordinated Access Network

Leadership Committee Agenda

Wednesday, March 6^th, 2019

In Attendance:
Steve Bigler - CRT
Kara Capobianco - DOH
Crane Cesario - DMHAS
Stephanie Corbin - Mercy Housing and Shelter
Sarah DiMaio - Salvation Army
Fred Faulkner - The Open Hearth
Heather Flannery - Interval House
Rosemary Flowers - My Sisters' Place
Mollie Greenwood - Journey Home
Audrey Kennedy - South Park Inn
John Lawlor - The Connection
Rebekah Lyas - ImmaCare
Tina Ortiz - CRT
Elijah McFoley - The Open Hearth
Matt Morgan - Journey Home
Lisa Quach - Journey Home
Lionel Rigler - City of Hartford
Zoe Schwartz - CRT
Barbara Shaw- Hands On Hartford
Kathy Shaw - My Sisters' Place / Community Housing Advocates
Cathy Zeiner - YWCA

2.      City of Hartford ESG Prevention Discussion – Joan Barere

a.      When we developed this program three years ago we were figuring out what Diversion and Prevention looks like in our community.  We are required to spend no less than 40% of our ESG funding on prevention or diversion. 

b.      It’s the City’s intent to gain feedback from this meeting, with the goal of revisiting this discussion item in 2 weeks.  $107,000 annually.  Over the past few years Lionel has heard that this project is vital, but we want to get feedback.

                                                    i.     If we’re in agreement that this program must continue, we need to RFP this project.  The city is hoping to seek council approval in May, and then quickly RFP the funding.

                                                   ii.     Stephanie explained this program, and outlined that it was really used as more of a prevention program than as a diversion program. 

                                                  iii.     Program requirements have generated some challenges in utilizing this program, because the program is a little restrictive. 

3.      City of Hartford ESG Allocations – Lionel Rigler

a.      Lionel had previously presented allocations that focused on size of the shelters with a limited focus.

b.      Two new allocations were presented today.  One was aggressively focused on performance measures, and a third option was a hybrid based on utilization and performance measures.

c.      Open Hearth increased dramatically in size. 

4.      Coordinated Exit:

a.      Performance Measures – Crane Cesario

                                                    i.     We’ve been talking over the past few months about performance measures.  We’re looking at these measures that we’ve been receiving at a statewide meeting.  We had been getting  report previously from the Statewide Team.  The CT DOH team is no longer keeping track of the 4 benchmarks that we had been using in the past.

                                                   ii.     We’re being judged on our performance, and it’s part of our community mission to end chronic homelessness.  We’re at the point where we have maybe under 40 people because they’re truly becoming chronic, or are aged into chronicity, or there are folks who are being consistently refused. 

                                                  iii.     We have a small end-group for us to discuss. 

                                                  iv.     We need to identify a way to prevent folks from staying in shelter in a really long-term way.  We need to make sure that all of our organizations are operating in a very strengths-based way to ensure that folks are rapidly leaving the homeless services system. 

                                                   v.     So for future meeting, at next Ops meeting, we will bring some of the top folks there. 

1.      Mollie and Lisa will divide up this list and request updates.

a.      In 2 weeks we’ll return with what we’ll talk about.  We’ll likely come back with a shorter list. 

b.      Matt will submit a release bin item to request a flag full self-certifications so programs would know their limits. 

b.      Longest Stayers in Greater Hartford CAN – Lisa Quach

c.      By Name List Weekly Report – Mollie Greenwood

                                                    i.     GH Leadership agreed to use this as our data document to observe change over time. 

d.      Progressive Engagement – Kara Capobianco

                                                    i.     The PE document is as finalized as it can be, but a meeting was postponed.  Some national definitions at a national level have been changing. 

                                                   ii.     It’s really a complex issue to figure out how to do RRH in a way that focuses on equity rather than equality. 

5.      Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Proposed Changes – Matt Morgan

a.      The City of Hartford has sought a request for a proposal to update the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Preferences at Journey Home.  Journey Home has requested a set aside of 20 vouchers per month.  In addition, as they’re re-doing the program and need to put the program up for public comment, we also wanted to make some suggestions. 

                                                    i.     One suggestion is to open up the project-based Moving On program for folks who are literally homeless.

1.      There was a suggestion to allow folks coming out of RRH and PSH to be eligible for these openings as well.

2.      There was also a suggestion to add points onto the family and youth preference to give additional points on the waitlist based on months spent in RRH.

3.      Finally, there’s a suggestion to open a new preference that would be available for folks who are failing out of PSH and returning to homelessness AND for folks who are 9+ months homeless. 

6.      Advocacy Day Preparations – Matt Morgan

7.      Sub-COC Updates – Crane Cesario, Zoe Schwartz

8.      Coordinated Entry:

a.      Cold Weather Protocol Updates – Sarah DiMaio

9.      GH CAN Shelter and Housing Data

a.      GH CAN Housed Data (see p.2)

b.      GH CAN Waitlist Data (see p.2)

10.   Future Agenda Items?

a.      Comparison of longest stayers vs. potentially chronic. 

11.   Announcements

a.      CAN Data Dashboards are available at www.CTCANData.org .  Please check out your organization’s data and work on cleaning up any incorrect data so that we can start using these dashboards to inform our system work.

b.      CT Department of Housing has distributed a survey on CAN performance, please encourage your staff and colleagues to complete this survey by COB March 8^th.

GH CAN Housing Data

Data Element	Number	Notes
Chronically homeless individuals housed in 2015	102	This includes clients housed through GH CAN programs as well as through other subsidies or independent housing
Chronically homeless individuals housed in 2016	211	This includes clients housed through GH CAN programs as well as through other subsidies or independent housing
Chronically homeless individuals housed in 2017	179	This includes clients housed through GH CAN programs as well as through other subsidies or independent housing
Chronically homeless/potentially chronic individuals housed in 2018	151	This includes clients housed through GH CAN programs and bridges to PSH as well as through other subsidies or independent housing
Chronically homeless/potentially chronic individuals housed in 2019	28	This includes clients housed through GH CAN programs and bridges to PSH as well as through other subsidies or independent housing
Total Chronically homeless individuals housed in GH CAN	671
Verified Chronic Matched	30
Verified Chronic Not Yet Matched	12	We currently have 12 chronic verified clients who have not yet been matched to housing.
Potentially Chronic Refusers	0
Verified Chronic Refusers	2
Not Chronic (Verified) Refuser	1
Potentially Chronic Matched	8	These households did not disclose a disabling condition, and are matched to various programs.
Not Chronic Matched	19
Potentially Chronic Not Yet Matched	32	Right now we believe 32 households have the chronic length of homeless history, but none of these individuals have their homeless and disability verifications completed.
Individuals - Active – Not Matched	339	This is Enrolled in CAN, Enrolled in TH, and In an Institution
Families – Active – Not Matched	39	This is Enrolled in CAN and Enrolled in TH
Families - Verified Chronic – Not Matched	0
Families – Potentially Chronic – Matched	1
Families – Potentially Chronic – Not Matched	1
Families – Not Chronic (Verified) – Matched	9	This includes RRH bridges
Families – Verified Chronic – Matched	2

SmartSheet Shelter Priority List Data

Individual Men	Individual Women	Family Stabilization List
89 unsheltered	85 unsheltered	17 families on Stabilization List
109 total	102 total